- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIA 17204/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17204 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramshakal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kalyan Sundram Srivastava,Satyam Shivam Sundaram Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Tanisha Jahangir Monir Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
¶1Heard Sri K.S. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Ms. Tanisha Jahangir Monir has accepted notice on behalf of the respondents no.2 and 3.
¶2This writ petition has been nominated to this Bench under the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by Hon'ble the Chief Justice.
¶3It is contended that against an order dated 24.02.2023, the petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal, by registered post, under Rule 69 of U.P. S.R.T.C. Employees (Other than Officers) Service Regulation, 1981 before the respondent no.2.
¶4Prayer for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid appeal has been made.
¶5Considering the fact that about eight months have elapsed from the date of filing of the appeal, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 (Principal Manager (Operation), U.P.S.R.T.C. Parivahan Bhawan, Tihari Kothi, Lucknow) to decide the statutory appeal before 31.01.2024 after providing full opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and strictly in accordance with law, provided a certified copy of this order along with memo of appeal is filed before the respondent no.2 by the end of November, 2023. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 AKShukla/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.