VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Meghnath v. State of U.P

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
5 November 2023
Case no.
BAIL 21508/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21508 of 2023 Applicant :- Meghnath Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satish Kumar Yadav,Dalvir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2The accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.357 of 2022 under section 5/25 Arms Act, P.S. Bichhwan, District Mainpuri.

¶3The FIR in question was lodged alleging that on the basis of a search carried out, arms were recovered which are country made pistols.

¶4The counsel for the applicant argues that the recovery was not in terms of the mandate of section 100 Cr.P.C. and there were no independent witnesses to the alleged recovery and the applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 14.11.2022.

¶5This court had called for a report with regard to the status of the trial and in terms whereof, it is reported that the charges have not been framed till date and the eight witnesses are to be adduced.

¶6Considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since

14.11.2022 and the trial has not yet been started as well as the recovery being not in the presence of any independent witnesses and the applicant who has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.

¶7Let the applicant Meghnath be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 VNP/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.