VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nasir and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
5 November 2023
Case no.
A482 39959/2019

Judgment

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39959 of 2019 Applicant :- Nasir And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Faiz Hasnain,Mohd. Hasham Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Krishna Dutt Tiwari Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and Sri Krishna Dutt Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2.

¶2The present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 01.04.2017 passed by A.C.J.M., Court No. 2, Moradabad in Case No. 09 of 2016 as well as order dated

22.09.2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Moradabad in Criminal Revision No. 89 of 2017 and order dated

08.05.2019 passed by A.C.J.M., Court No. 1, Moradabad in Case No. 4737 of 2017, under Sections 452, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. -Mundapande, District -Moradabad.

¶3Learned counsel for applicants submitted applicants and opposite party No. 2 are residents of same locality and under some understanding, criminal proceedings are initiated by both the parties. Ultimately, they have entered into compromise and no dispute is remain as on date. It is next submitted that in the light of compromise between the parties, connected Application U/S 482 No. 20976 of 2018 has been allowed by this Court vide order dated

06.11.2023. Therefore, in light of compromise, present proceeding may be quashed.

¶4Sri Krishna Dutt Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 has not disputed the aforesaid facts and submitted that in case present proceeding is quashed, he would have no objection.

¶5In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶6Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.

¶7The present application is, accordingly allowed.

¶8No order as to costs. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Sartaj High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.