VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajesh Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and 16 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
5 November 2023
Case no.
WRIC 29048/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29048 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajesh Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Archana Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Vakalatnama preferred by Sri Prince Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 7, 8, 9, 12, 15 and 16 is taken on record.

¶2Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing counsel for State respondents and Sri Prince Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 7, 8, 9, 12, 15 and 16.

¶3Present petition has been filed seeking mandamus in the nature of directing the concern respondent authorities to comply the order dated 05.06.2023 passed by the respondent no. 3/Up Zila Adhikari, Tehsil Obra, District Sonbhadra in Case no. 990 of 2022 (Rajesh Pratap Singh versus State), under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and directing the respondents concern to remove the illegal encroachments/possession of the respondent nos. 7 to 17 from the land of the petitioner and take legal action against respondent nos. 7 to 17.

¶4At the very outset, learned Standing counsel came up with specific instructions which is taken on record through which it has been transpired that proceeding of "pathargaddi" over the plot no. 4279 and 4281 will be completed by the revenue authorities on dated 07.11.2023 and notice in this regard has already been issued to the petitioner and as such no cause of action survives for petitioner to pursue the instant petition and the same stands disposed of. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Shaswat High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.