Sunil Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16986 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sunil Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and and learned A.G.A. for the State. By means of the present criminal writ petition, the petitioner are challenging the legality and validity of the F.I.R. dated

12.08.2023 registered as Case Crime no. 356 of 2023 u/S 307 I.P.C and Section 7 of Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, P.S.- Narkhi, District-Firozabad. After reading the entire FIR carefully, we are of the considered opinion that cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner and there is no reason or occasion to quash the F.I.R. in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the prayer for quashing the F.I.R. is hereby declined and accordingly rejected. However, if so advised, the petitioner may file anticipatory bail before appropriate forum for redressal of their grievance within next ten days from today. However, it is made clear that the Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, learned court concerned is expected to apply its robust judicial discretion in deciding the anticipatory bail as early as possible. With this observation, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Shubham Arya High Court of Judicature at Allahabad