- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Case no.
- A483 1307/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 45 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1307 of 2023 Applicant :- Vijaynarayan Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Madhukar Maurya,Rishabh Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
¶1Heard Shri Rishabh Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
¶2By means of the present application under Section 483 Cr.P.C., the applicant has sought for a suitable direction to the Trial Court to decide the case no. 190 of 2023, (under Section 138 of N.I. Act) (Vijaynarayan Pandey vs. Dilip Kumar Gupta), District Jaunpur pending before the Additional Civil Judge, (J.D.) third/Judicial Magistrate, Jaupur, within time stipulated by this Court.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has filed a compliant on 06.04.2023, under Section 138 N.I. Act which is pending disposal before the court of Additional Civil Judge, (J.D.) third/Judicial Magistrate and cognizance on the compliant was taken on 06.06.2023. By drawing attention of the Court to certain orders annexed to the application, from perusal of the order, it transpires that matter is listed sometime twice or thrice in a month and still he is coming up with a prayer for expeditious disposal of the case. No plausible reason or ground is taken in the application neither addressed during the arguments to support his contentions.
¶4The application is misconceived and is dismissed. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Ujjawal High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.