Daddan Verma @ Pramod v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47588 of 2023 Applicant :- Daddan Verma @ Pramod Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Chandra Solanki,Varsha Soni Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2The FIR in question was lodged against three unknown persons alleging that they had snatched a mobile, vehicle and Rs.2 lakh from the informant. Subsequently, the applicant was arrested. It is argued that no recovery was effected from the applicant and only on the basis of the statement of the co-accused, the applicant was apprehended. The applicant has no criminal antecedent.

¶3Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶4Considering the fact that the applicant was not named in the FIR, no recovery was effected from the applicant and the only evidence against him is the statement of the co-accused, as such, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicant Daddan Verma @ Pramod be released on bail in FIR No.52 of 2022, under Section 394, 342 IPC, P.S. Safai, District Etawah on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 nishant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad