- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Case no.
- A227 11088/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11088 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ghanshyam And Another Respondent :- Sanjay Kumar Counsel for Petitioner :- Virpratap Singh Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to amend the prayer clause of the petition during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondents. The petitioner before this Court is seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ballia to decide Original Suit No. 55/2020 within stipulated period of time. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the matter is pending consideration, the petitioner is suffering irreparable loss. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the concerned court below to consider and decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law expeditiously, but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Amit Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.