Krishna Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P

Court No. - 72 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46430 of 2023 Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Gupta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Atharva Dixit Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶1List has been revised.

¶2Heard Sri Amit Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Atharva Dixit, learned counsel for the informant as well as Ms. Ifra Islam, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 655 of 2023, under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120-B of I.P.C. and Section 63 of Copyright Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Banda, during the pendency of trial.

¶4It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused person, Upendra Kumar Gupta, has already been enlarged on bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.10.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 44238 of 2023. He further submitted that since the case of the applicant is at par with the co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 22.08.2023, having no criminal history. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with trial.

¶5The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the first informant. However, the aforesaid factual aspects of parity to the co-accused and of no criminal history of the applicant, have not been disputed by them.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, pending trial and in light of the judgement passed by this Court in Nanha S/o Nabhan Kha vs. State of U.P., 1993 Crl.L.J. 938 and the judgement passed by the Apex Court in Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, MANU/SCOR/22410/2021, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

¶7Let the applicant-Krishna Kumar Gupta, involved in aforementioned case crime number be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. ii. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. iii. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. iv. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. v. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. vi. The applicant shall not sell the cigarette pertaining to the company Shyam Bidi except the original cigarettes as may be produced by the company.

¶8In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶9Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶10It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion on the testimony of the witnesses. (Justice Krishan Pahal) Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Siddhant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad