Raj Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37957 of 2023 Applicant :- Raj Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash charge-sheet dated

16.01.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated

15.07.2023 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 710 of 2023 (State Vs. Anil and others), arising out of Case Crime No.216 of 2020, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 452 and 354(b) IPC, Police Station Newadhiya, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of Civil Judge (S.D.), FTC, Jaunpur.

¶3After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicants are ready to appear before the court below and seek their bail and that their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC

51.

¶4Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶5In view of the above, in case the applicants appear before the court below within three weeks from today and seek bail, their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶6With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Subham High Court of Judicature at Allahabad