Satya Prakash v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38588 of 2023 Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhiraj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Dhiraj Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶2Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide Partition Suit No. T202105200200915 (Munna and another Vs. Singasan and others), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid matter is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no. 2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶5Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no. 2 is hereby directed to consider and decide the Partition Suit No. T202105200200915 (Munna and another Vs. Singasan and others), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶6With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 P.Sri. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad