Arpit Sharma and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36899 of 2023 Applicant :- Arpit Sharma And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Mishra,Vinay Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 26.07.2023 as well entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.83 of 2022 (Kumari Juhi Vs. Arpit Sharma & Another) P.S. Bhanwarkol, District Ghazipur against the applicant no. 1, under Sections 363, 366 and 376 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act and against the applicant no. 2 under Section 363 I.P.C.

¶3On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶4Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶5Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶6Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicants shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case apply for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law.

¶7For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Meenu Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad