Munendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43666 of 2023 Applicant :- Munendra Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Pratibha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶2Learned Counsel for the applicant argued that the co-accused Brahm Singh has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 30.10.2023.

¶3The allegation made against the applicant Munendra Pratap Singh, the co-accused has been enlarged on bail. As the applicant has no criminal history, the applicant be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶4Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶5There is nothing on record to demonstrate that the applicant if enlarged on bail, would in any way adversely affect the trial and without expressing any opinion on merit, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶6Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶7Let the applicant - Munendra Pratap Singh be released on bail in Case Crime No.153 of 2023, under Sections - 364/201 I.P.C., P.S. - Mirahchi, District - Etah, on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Irshad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad