Nishu Chaudhary and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2586 of 2020 Applicant :- Nishu Chaudhary And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anuj Chaudhary,Mohd Mohiuddin Siddiqui,Niraj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Rana,Shami Ullah Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and the learned A.G.A.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of Criminal S.S.T. No. 1110 of 2019 (State vs. Sumit Kumar), arising out of Case Crime No. 177 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Nageena, District Bijnor, as well as charge sheet dated 19.12.2018 along with cognizance order dated

08.02.2019 pending in the court of Additional District Judge, Court No. 07, Bijnor.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 have reconciled their differences and a compromise has been entered between them, and they want to file the said compromise before the lower court concerned. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings before the court below and the same is not only sheer wastage of time of the Court but also abuse of process of law.

¶4Learned AGA, however, submits that it is the concerned court below, which has to verify the fact as to whether the parties have entered into compromise, hence the applicants may approach the concerned court below and move an application along with copy of compromise between the parties, which will be decided in accordance with law.

¶5In view of the above, the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 are directed to appear before the court below along with compromise and an application for verification of compromise deed so filed as well as a certified copy of this order within four weeks from today. It is expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the compromise and after ensuring their presence, pass an appropriate order with respect to the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from today. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the concerned court shall also record the statement of the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not.

¶6The court in that scenario will allow the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶7For a period of two months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 v.k.updh. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad