- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 34100/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34100 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sabharaj Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Srivastava,Mohammad Akram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Udit Chandra Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
¶1By means of this writ petition the provisional assessment order dated 11.01.2021 has been challenged. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that a reply was submitted on August, 2023, but thereafter no final assessment order had been passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has therefore submitted that a recovery was being made on the basis of the provisional assessment.
¶2Learned counsel for the Electricity Department, Sri Udit Chandra states that under no circumstances could the recovery be done on the basis of the provisional assessment.
¶3Under such circumstances, the Court considers it appropriate to direct the Electricity Department to consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. Recovery be thereafter done only after the final assessment is done. The representation be decided within a period of two months.
¶4For a period of two months or till such time as the representation is decided whichever is earlier no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner.
¶5With these observations, the writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Order Date :- 7.11.2023/vkj High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.