Pramila Singh v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47868 of 2023 Applicant :- Pramila Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhil Ranjan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2It is argued that the co-accused of the FIR namely Sunil Chaudhary has been enlarged on bail vide order which is on record at Page - 105. Even otherwise, the whole dispute arises out of a civil dispute arising in between the parties. The applicant is a female and is in custody since 09.10.2023.

¶3Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶4Considering the fact that co-accused has been enlarged on bail coupled with the fact that the applicant is a female and is in custody since 09.10.2023, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicant Pramila Singh be released on bail in FIR No.790 of 2022, under Section 420, 467, 468, 471 & 447 IPC, P.S. Cantt. District Gorakhpur on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 nishant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad