Jaiveer Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38060 of 2023 Applicant :- Jaiveer Singh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Sri Satish Kumar Shukla, advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and Sri Satish Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

¶3The present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 10.05.2018, summoning order dated 12.04.2019 as well as entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 4464 of 2019 (State vs. Jaiveer and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 41 of 2018, under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 120B IPC, Police Station-Medical College, District-Meerut, pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No. 4, Meerut.

¶4Learned counsel for applicants submitted that present criminal proceeding is arising out of matrimonial dispute. He next submitted that now applicant No. 1 and opposite party No. 2 have entered into compromise and decided to live together as husband & wife. Therefore, in light of compromise, present proceeding may be quashed.

¶4Sri Satish Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has not objected the aforesaid fact and submitted that in case proceedings is quashed, he would have no objection.

¶5In view of above, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶6Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.

¶7The present application is, accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Arvind High Court of Judicature at Allahabad