VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohammad Alim Ansari v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 November 2023
Case no.
WRIC 30417/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30417 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohammad Alim Ansari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Juned Alam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. The matter was taken up on 17.10.2023 and this Court has passed following order:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sharad Chandra Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel.

¶2Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the impugned order dated 11.8.2023 passed by respondent no.3 and for a direction to respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to cut the tree, which was auctioned in his favour.

¶3In response to the order dated 15.9.2023, learned Standing Counsel placed the instructions dated 20.09.2023 sent by the Divisional Forest Officer, Kushinagar, which is taken on record. On the basis of instructions, he submits that the matter is ceased before the authority concerned for settlement.

¶4Put up this matter as fresh on 8.11.2023. In case, the petitioner is not accorded permission to cut the trees, the respondents must return the admitted amount to the petitioner on or before the next date fixed in the matter." On the matter being taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner apprised to the Court that the grievance of the petitioner is moreover redressed as the permission is accorded to the petitioner to cut the tress. In view of the above, we are not inclined to keep the matter further pending consideration. The matter is consigned to record. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 A. Pandey High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.