VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pramila Devi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 November 2023
Case no.
WRIC 37443/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37443 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pramila Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suneel Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1Heard Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.

¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No.2, Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Phoolpur, District Azamgarh to decide the case No. 5323 of 2022, Computerized case No. T202215060305323 (Smt. Pramila Devi Vs. Udayraj) under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.

¶3Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid mutation case is pending before respondent no.2 for adjudication.

¶4Copy of the order sheet has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding according to the provisions contained under Rule 34 (7) of U.P. Revenue Code, Rules 2016.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2, Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Phoolpur, District Azamgarh to consider and decide the aforementioned mutation case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.