- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 3755/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3755 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramesh Rastogi And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K. Maurya I Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State.
¶2Grievance of petitioners is that Restoration Application No. 450/811 in Appeal No. 69 of 1984, (Surendra and others vs. Paudhary and others), under Section 21(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 is pending before Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Varanasi and the same has not been decided till date.
¶3I have perused the order sheet annexed alongwith this writ petition. On various dates the Advocates have not appeared on the ground of their call for abstention from judicial work. Therefore, the authority concerned cannot be put on fault.
¶4At this stage, learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners undertake that on next as well as on subsequent dates either petitioners themselves or their Advocate shall appear and will not take any adjournment.
¶5Taking note of undertaking given by learned counsel for petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of that concerned authority shall take endeavour to decide above case expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from today, if there is no legal impediment, taking note of judgment passed by Full Bench of this Court in Smt. Sivraji and others vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, Allahabad and others, 1997 SCC OnLine All 505. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 AK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.