- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 38880/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38880 of 2023 Petitioner :- Meena Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav,Zafaryab Hussain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
¶1Heard Sri Om Prakash, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents no.1 and 2 as well as Sri Pradeep Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
¶2Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.2 to decide recall application dated 21.03.2023 preferred by petitioner in Case No.3082 of 2022 (Meena Devi Vs. State of U.P.), under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid matter is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
¶5Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide the recall application dated 21.03.2023 preferred by petitioner in Case No.3082 of 2022 (Meena Devi Vs. State of U.P.), under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.
¶6With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.11.2023/Vivek Kr. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.