Kewla Shankar Shukla v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3771 of 2023 Petitioner :- Kewla Shankar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhanshu Pandey,Mayank Mohan Dutt Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

¶1Grievance of petitioner is that Appeal No.1356/2021-22 (Thakur Prasad Vs. Girija Shankar and others), under Rule 109-A-(3) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules is pending before respondent No.2 and the same has not been decided till date.

¶2I have perused the order sheet annexed along with this writ petition. On various dates the Advocates have not appeared on the ground of their call for abstention from judicial work. Therefore, the Authority concerned cannot put on fault.

¶3At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner on instruction submits that petitioner undertakes that on next as well as on subsequent dates either petitioner himself or his Advocate shall appear before concerned Authority and will not take any adjournment.

¶4Taking note of undertaking given by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of that concerned Authority shall take endeavour to decide the aforesaid appeal expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from today, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 P. Pandey High Court of Judicature at Allahabad