- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Case no.
- CRLR 2676/2011
Judgment
Court No. - 79 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2676 of 2011 Revisionist :- Smt. Aneeta Bothra And Anr. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajeev Chaddha Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Anil Kumar Pathak,Ganesh Mani Tripathi Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Heard Sri D.K. Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rajeev Chaddha, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. No one is present on behalf of opposite party no.2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that the parties have settled their dispute amicably outside the Court and as such he does not want to press this revision. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Prajapati High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.