- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Case no.
- A482 20894/2014
Judgment
Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20894 of 2014 Applicant :- Lakkhu Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Srivastva,D.K. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
¶1None is present on behalf of the applicants to press the instant application even in the revised call.
¶2Learned AGA for the State is present.
¶3In the instant case, vide order dated 02.06.2014, the notice was issued to opposite party no.2 and the counter affidavit on behalf of the State was filed on 24.6.2014, however, no rejoinder affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicants till today.
¶4On 03.01.2019, the time was sought on behalf of the applicants for filing rejoinder affidavit despite that the rejoinder affidavit has not been filed. Lastly on 26.05.2023, none was present on behalf of the applicants to press the instant petition.
¶5It appears that applicants as well as their counsels are not willing to pursue the instant application, therefore, the instant application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 A.N. Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.