Deena Rawat v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48182 of 2023 Applicant :- Deena Rawat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Atharva Dixit Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard Sri Amit Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Atharva Dixit, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and perused the record.

¶2The Counsel for the applicant argues that arising out of the same FIR, three of the co-accused have been enlarged on bail.

¶4Learned A.G.A. as well as learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶5Considering the submission of parity of the Counsel for the applicant, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶6Let the applicant Deena Rawat be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No.655 of 2023, under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Banda on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad