VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Imran v. State of U.P

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 November 2023
Case no.
BAIL 45922/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45922 of 2023 Applicant :- Imran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2In terms of the FIR in question, it was alleged that on the basis of information received, a search was carried out and certain computers and other documents were recovered, based upon which a view was formed that the applicants were involved in duping the persons in the name of sending them abroad.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that other co-accused Ravi Kant Sharma with whom same allegation were leveled has been enlarged on bail. He further submits that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, hence the applicant who has no criminal antecedents to his credit and he is in jail since

21.7.2023, is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶4Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶5Considering the fact that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶6Let the applicant Imran be released on bail in Case Crime No. 247 of 2023, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Simbhawali, district-Hapur, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Faridul High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.