- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Case no.
- WPIL 2595/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 39 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2595 of 2023 Petitioner :- Atul Srivastava And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kameshwar Rao Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
¶1Heard Shri Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kameshwar Rao, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned Standing Counsel.
¶2Petitioner seeks direction upon the respondents to not construct a drain as there is sufficient drainage in the area.
¶3Insofar as the petitioner is not an expert in urban planning and drainage and insofar as no real cause is shown to exist with the petitioner to make such a prayer which is seen to be primarily opposed to a public work, interference claimed is declined.
¶4Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Prakhar (Shiv Shanker Prasad, J.) (S.D. Singh, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.