Hariom v. Naib Tehsildar (Western) and Another

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38895 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hariom Respondent :- Naib Tehsildar (Western) And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Dhar Goswami,Pradeep Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.

¶2Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.1 to decide Case No.416 of 2015, Computerized Case No.T201514290203901 (Hariom Vs. Raghubar), under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid matter is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.1 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶5Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.1 is hereby directed to consider and decide the Case

No.416

of

2015,

Computerized

Case No.T201514290203901 (Hariom Vs. Raghubar), under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶6With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Vivek Kr. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad