Tulsi and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27587 of 2023 Petitioner :- Tulsi And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Verma,Krishna Kant Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Padmaker Pandey Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1Heard Mr. Devesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. S.P. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. S.C. Verma, learned Advocate assisted by Mr. Padmakar Pandey learned counsel for respondent No.5.

¶2Brief facts of the case are that Tehsildar vide order dated

1.10.2014 under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act ordered to record the name of respondent no.5 on the basis of sale deed executed by Mst. Kesha on 1.6.2013 in favour of respondent no.5 in respect to 1/2 share of Plot No.1696 Ka area 0.080 hectare, 1697 area 0.1000 hectare, 1698 area 0.1000 hectare, 1701 area 0.2000 hectare total area

0.480 hectare situated in Village-Katri Khewra, Pergana, Tehsil and District-Kanpur Nagar. Petitioners challenged the order of Tehsildar dated 1.10.2014 in appeal before Sub Divisional Officer under Section 210 of U.P. Land Revenue Act which was dismissed vide order dated 14.9.2016. Petitioners again challenged the appellate order in Revision under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act which has been dismissed vide order dated 7.2.2023 hence this writ petition on behalf of the petitioner challenging the impugned judgment dated 1.10.2014 passed by respondent no.4, judgment dated 14.9.2016 passed by respondent no.3 and judgment dated 7.2.2023 passed by respondent no.2. Civil Proceedings are pending before Civil Court including Civil Suit No. 1455 of 2013 filed by petitioners in respect to sale deed in question.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that mutation application filed on behalf of respondent No.5 on the basis of sale deed alleged to be executed on 01.06.2013 has been allowed in arbitrary manner and the order has been maintained in appeal and revision without considering the case of the petitioners. He further submitted that one Civil suit No.1456 of 2016 filed by petitioners against one Dharmendra Kumar, Rajesh Kumar as well as Shamshad Alam was decreed ex-parte by judgment and decree dated

23.5.2022 by which the sale deed executed on 19.2.2016 in favour of Dharmendra Kumar Verma was cancelled. He further submitted that judgment and decree dated

23.05.2022 passed in civil suit No.1456 of 2016 was placed before the revisional court, but revisional court without considering the judgment and decree of the civil court has dismissed the revision, hence this writ petition.

¶4Mr. S.C. Verma assisted by Mr. Padmaker Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.5 submitted that sale deed executed by recorded owner in favour of respondent No.5 on 01.06.2013 has not been cancelled till date by any Court. He further submitted that mutation application on the basis of alleged sale deed dated 01.06.2013 was allowed by the Tehsildar and order has been maintained in appeal and revision. He further submitted that Commissioner has rightly recorded the finding that there is no evidence on record for cancellation of sale deed executed on 01.06.2013. He further submitted that petitioners have challenged the sale deed executed in favour of respondent No.5 through Civil Suit No. 1455 of 2013 but the matter is pending before civil court, as such there is no illegality in the order of mutation passed by Tehsildar, which has been maintained in appeal and revision. He further submitted that decree passed by Civil Court in Suit No. 1456 of 2016 is in respect to different matter as such the same can not be relied upon. He further placed finding of fact recorded by the Commissioner regarding death certificate produced by the petitioners in the proceeding in order to demonstrate that petitioners have committed fraud in obtaining death certificate of Kesha @ Parvati. He further submitted that no interference is required in the matter as writ petition arises out of summary proceeding under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act.

¶5I have considered the arrangements advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶6There is no dispute about the fact that Tehsildar has passed the order for mutation in favour of respondent No.5 on the basis of the sale deed executed on 01.06.2013 and order of Tehsildar has been maintained in appeal and revision

¶7The finding of fact recorded by Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil-Sadar, District-Kanpur Nagarwill be relevant for perusal whicheiseaseunder: . मणडलः-eकानपुर नयायालयeआयकु वादeसंखयाः-e03107/2016 तुलसीeआवदeबनामeशीमतीeसुषमाeअवसथीeआवद कं पयूटरीकृ तeवादeसंखयाः-eC201603000003107 अंतगरतeधाराः-e219,उ०प०eभू-राजसवeअजधवनयम,1901 आदेशeवतजथः-e07/02/2023 अंवतमeआदेश आदेशe

7.eसंकेपeमेeतथयeयहeहeै वकeपंजीकतeववቅय-पतeवदनांकe01.06.2013eजोeबहीeन०ं 1ृ जजलदeन०ं 6037eके eपृषe127eसेe150,eቅमांकe3158eपरeउपeवनबनधकe(जोन-2)eकानपुर नगर e मेe रजजसट्ीकृ त e करायाe गया, eके e दाराe आराजीe सं० e1696 eक e रकबा

0.0800 हे०,1697 eरकबाe 0.1000 हे०,e1698 eरकबाe 0.10000 हे०,e1701 eरकबा

0.2000eहे०eकु लeरकबाeti.4800 हे०‌बसथतeगामeकटरीeखयोराeपरगनाeवeजजलाeकानपुर नगरeके e?eभागeरकबाeti.2400eहे०eकोeशीमतीeके शाeपतनीeननदाeनेeशीमतीeसुषमाeअवसथी पतनीeशीeमनोजeअवसथीeकोeववቅयeवकया।eउकeपंजीकृ तeववቅय-पतeवदनांकe01.06.2013 के eआधारeपरeनामानतरणeआदेशeवदनांकe11.07.2013eशीमतीeसुषमाeअवसथीeउ्रदाता सं०-1 eके e पकe मeे पाररतeहहआ।eआदेशeवदनांक e11.07.2013 eके e ववरदe ववनायकeशी डेवलपसरeपा०जल०eदाराeअजधकृ तeपवतवनजधeअवनरदeवतवेदीeकीeओरeसेeपरीकणeनयायालय मेe वदनांक e19.09.2013 eकोe वeतुलसीe आवदe कीe ओरeसेe वदनांक e31.10.2013 eको रसे टोरशे नeपाथरना-पतeपसतुतeवकयेeगये।eपरीकणeनयायालयeदाराeपकोeकोeसुननेeके eउपरानत आदेशeवदनांकe01.10.2014eदाराeआपज्कतारगणeतुलसीeआवदeवeववनायकeशीeडेवलपसर ह रपा०जल० e कीe आपज्याँe वनरसत e करतेe हए e पूवe पाररत e नामानतरण e आदेश e वदनांक

11.07.2013 eयथावत e बहाल e वकयाe गया। e परीकण e नयायालय e के e आदेश e वदनांक े01.10.2014eके eववरदeतुलसीeआवदeदाराeअपीलीयeनयायालयeमeअपीलeयोजजतeकरeकहा वकeबनै ामाeफजरeह।ै eके शाeकाeसवगरवासeबहहतeपहलेeहोeगयाeथा।eअपीलीयeनयायालयeके आदेशeवदनांक e14.09.2016 eके e दाराe तुलसीe आवदe कीe अपीलeवदनांक e13.10.2014 खाररजeकरeदीeगयी।eपरीकणeनयायालयeके eआदेशeवदनांकe01.10.2014eएवंeअपीलीय नयायालयeके e आदेशeवदनांक e14.09.2016 eके eववरदe यहeवनगरानीeतुलसीe आवदeदारा योजजतeकीeगयीeह।ै

8.eवादeगसतeसमपज्eके eसमबनधeमेeपंजीकृ तeववቅयeववलेखeवदनांकe01.06.2013eकाeह।ै वनगरानीकतारगणeके eअनुसारeके शाeउफर eपावरतीeकीeमतृ यeु वदनांकe06.12.1958eकोeहहईeह,ै र रजोeगामeपंचायतeअजधकारी,eववकासखणडeकलयानपुर,eकानपुरeनगरeदाराeके शाeउफeपावती के eमृतयeु पमाण-पतeवदनांकe10.02.2015eसेeसपषeह।ै eजबवकeउ्रदाताeसं०-1eशीमती र र हसुषमाeअवसथीeके eअनुसारeके शाeउफeपावतीeकीeमृतयeु वदनांकe01.04.02016eकोeहईeजो अजधशासीeअजधकारी,eनगरीयeववकासeववभाग,eगगं ाघाट,eउ्ावeदाराeजारीeमृतयeपमाण-पतु वदनांक e21.04.2016 eसेe सावबतeह।ै eपकोe मेe वववावदतeसमपज्e के शाe उफर e पावरतीe के सवावमतवeकीeहोनेeमेeकोईeवववादeनहीeह।ै eवववादeयहeहैeवकeके शाeउफर eपावरतीeकीeमृतयeु वदनांक

06.12.1958eकोeहहईeहeै याeवदनांकe01.04.2016eकोeहहईeह?ै eइसeसमबनधeमेeमृतयeु पमाण-पतeवदनांकe10.02.2015eकीeजांचeहेतुeइसeनयायालयeदाराeपतeवदनांकe19.01.2023 मुखयeववकासeअजधकारी,eकानपुरeनगरeकोeपवे षतeवकयाeगया।eमुखयeववकासeअजधकारी, कानपुरeनगरeदाराeपकरणeकीeजांचeजजलाeपंचायतeराजeअजधकारी,eकानपुरeनगरeसेeकरायी

रयस और मपखय दवककस अधधककरस,

ककनपपर नरर नद अपनद पत सस०-2669/दव०/वह०सहक०/2022-23,

ददनकसक06.02.2023

दकरकजकसचआखयकइसनयकयकलय

कजउपलबधकरकयस,

धजसकदअवलजकनसदसपषहहदकततककलसनगकमपसचकयतअधधककरस

शसककषणमपरकरसपकठक,

अबसदवकदनवकतदकरककदशकउफरपकवरतसककमकतयपपमकण-

पतउसकद

जसदवतरहतदजकरसदकयकरयक,

धजसकदधलएशसककषणमपरकरसपकठकदजषसहह।इसकदअदतररक

धसदवलजज(जय०दड०) धसटस,

ककनपपरनररदकरकमयलवकदसस०1380/2013

शसमतसकदशक

बनकमतपलससममददनकसक29.11.2013

ममअवधकररतदकयकरयकहहदक"

वकददनससशरसर

वयदकरतरपसदनयकयकलयकदसमकउपससथतहहऔरअदभलदखसयसककयकदअनपसकरभस

वकददनसककमकतयपनहहहहईहह।"

इसपककरमपखयदवककसअधधककरस,

ककनपपरनररककआखयक

ददनकसक06.02.2023

एवसधसदवलजज(जय०दड०) धसटस,

ककनपपरनररकदआददशददनकसक

29.11.2013

सदपयणरतलसकदबतहहदककदशकउफरपकवरतसककमकतयपददनकसक06.12.1958 कज

नहसहहईहह,

बसलकपतकवलसपरउपलबधमकतयपपमकण-

पतसस०263168001122 ददनकसक

21.04.2016

सदकदशकउफरपकवरतसककमकतयपददनकसक01.04.2016

कजहजनकसकदबतहह।

सपषहहदकदवकय-

पतपसजसकरणककददनकसक01.06.2013

ममकदशकउफरपकवरतसजसदवतथस।

मपखयदवककसअधधककरस,

ककनपपरनररककजकसचआखयकददनकसक06.02.2013

सदसकदबतहह

दककदशकउफरपकवरतसकदजसदवतरहतदमकतयपपमकण-

पतततककलसनगकमपसचकयतअधधककरसशस

ककषणमपरकरसपकठक(

वतरमकनममसदवकदनवकत)

दकरकजकरसदकयकरयकहह।इसपककरकदशकउफर

पकवरतसककमकतयपपमकण-

पतजकरसकरनदकदधलएगकमपसचकयतअधधककरसशसककषणकमपरकरस

पकठकएवसजकरसकरकनदकदधलएदनररकनसकतकरणपथमदषयकदजषसहह।अतलउतरदकयससस०-

शसमतससपषमकअवसथसकदशकउफरपकवरतसकदमकतयपपमकण-

पतददनकसक10.02.2015 जकरस

करनदएवसजकरसकरकनदवकलककददवरदसमबसनधतथकनकधयककजपकथरनकपतपसतपतकरमऔर

थकनकधयकदजषसवयदकयककददवरदपथमसयचनकररपजटरदजरकरकददनयमकनपसकरककयरवकहस

करनकसपदनसशचतकरम।दवकय-

पतददनकसक01.06.2013

दकसससकमनयकयकलयदकरक

दनरसतहजनदकककजईसककयपतकवलसपरउपलबधनहहहह।ऐससससथदतममअधसनसथपरसकण

नयकयकलयएवसअपसलसयनयकयकलयकदआकदपतआददशकममकजईदवधधकतपदटपररलदकतनहह

हजतसहह।तदनपसकरदनररकनसबलहसनहजनदकदककरणदनरसतदकयदजकनदयजगयहह। 9-

उपरजकपसतर6 सद8

ममककरयसदववदचनककदआधकरपरदनररकनसदनरसतककजकतसहह।

आददशककसतयपदतधलदपकदसकथअधसनसथनयकयकलयककपतकवलसवकपसभदजसजकय।

आददशककसतयपदतधलदपसमबसनधततहससलदकरकजभदजसजकयददकवहइसआददशकक

अमलदरकमदरकजसवअदभलदखकममकरककरनयकयकलयकजअवरतकरकयम।बकदआवशयक

ककयरवकहसइसनयकयकलयककपतकवलसदकधखलतफतरककजकय।

ददनकसक07-02-2023 (

डक०रकजशदखर) आयपक,

ककनपपरमणडल।

¶8Considering the finding of fact recorded by Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil-Sadar, District-Kanpur Nagar, there is no scope for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

¶9It is also material that civil suit No.1455 of 2013 filed by petitioners for cancellation of sale deed dated 01.06.2013 is pending before the Civil Court.

¶10Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, no interference is required in the matter and writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

¶11Needless to say that order passed in mutation proceeding will not come in the way of petitioner to establish their claim before civil court in accordance with law. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 PS* High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad