Praveen Kumar Singh v. Commissioner Village Development Uttar Pradesh at Lucknow and 4 Others

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38437 of 2023 Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Singh Respondent :- Commissioner Village Development Uttar Pradesh At Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Azad Rai Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard the petitioner in person and Ms. Shubhra Singh, learned standing counsel for the State respondents.

¶2Present writ petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 and 3 for completing the enquiry of beneficiaries of Village Pahari Kala, Shankargarh Prayagraj in respect of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Gramin in pursuance of application dated

03.07.2023 and 21.08.2023."

¶3The petitioner is aggrieved that under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Gramin non-deserving candidates have been given certain benefits. In this regard, the petitioner has filed a complaint on 03.07.2023 before the Chief Minister in Janta Darshan. He submits that even though the complaint has been entertained but till date the respondents have not taken any cognizance over the said complaint.

¶4In such a situation, the petitioner is before this Court with a prayer that the respondent no.3, Pariyojana Nideshak Zila Gramin Gram Vikas Abhikaran, Prayagraj may be directed to take remedial measures so that the benefit of the said scheme may be extended only to the suitable persons.

¶5Mrs. Shubhra Singh, learned standing counsel has placed detained instructions dated 19.10.2023 sent by the Pariyojana Nideshak, District Gramya Vikas Abhikaran, Prayagraj, which is taken on record. On the basis of instructions, she submits that on the complaint of the petitioner three members team was constituted vide office letter no.540/Shi.Li./2023-24 dated 21.07.2023 and the said team has submitted its report, which reveals that on the spot statements of various villagers were recorded and it was found that all the allotments were in order. No illegality or infirmity was found in the allotments in question. Accordingly, the complaint was consigned to record.

¶6Considering the categorical instructions in the matter, we are not inclined to proceed further.

¶7Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.11.2023/S.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad