Vinod and Another v. State of U.P.And Another

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38385 of 2023 Applicant :- Vinod And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Shankar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

1.Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2.This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 4.12.2020 as well as entire proceedings of Case Crime No. 485 of 2019 (Vinod and another Vs. State), under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 325 IPC, Police Station-Rura, District-Kanpur Dehat, pending in the court of Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division)-I, Kanpur Dehat.

3.After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicants are ready to appear before the court below and seek their bail and that their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

4.Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

5.In view of the above, in case the applicants appear before the court below within three weeks from today and seek bail, their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

6.With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 KU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad