- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Case no.
- A227 11207/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11207 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Respondent :- Mithai Lal And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manik Chandra Yadav Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
¶2In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
¶3The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to direct the court below to decide the Suit No.1469 of 2016 (Radheyshyam and others Vs. Mithai Lal and others) expeditiously.
¶4It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that the matter is pending before the Court below since 2016 and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. The issues has already been framed in the year 2016.
¶5In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid suit expeditiously strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Pramod Tripathi High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.