Neelkamal @ Neetu and Another v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48546 of 2023 Applicant :- Neelkamal @ Neetu And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava,Rajendra Narain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2Learned counsel for the applicants argues that the applicants were earlier enlarged on bail. Subsequently, they could not appear as being a poor person had gone out of the State for earning livelihood. They undertake to co-operate with the trial.

¶3Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶4Considering the submissions made at the Bar, the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicant Neelkamal @ Neetu be released on bail in SST No.43 of 2015 arising out of Case Crime No.118 of 2015 and the applicant Shashi Kapoor be also released on bail in SST No.43 of 2015 arising out of Case Crime No.119 of 2015, both under Section 25 Arms Act, Police Station Maudarwaza, District Farrukhabad on their furnishing personal bonds with two fresh sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad