VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sunil Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
8 November 2023
Case no.
A482 38425/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38425 of 2023 Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Singh,Yogendra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.

¶1Heard Sri Yogengra Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sandeep Choudhary, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking direction from this Court for expeditious disposal of the Complaint Case No. 4555 of 2019 (Sunil Kumar Srivastava vs. Dhananjay Singh) u/S 138 of N.I. Act, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Deoria, within the time bound period.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the complaint case u/S 138 N.I. Act, was filed on 21.12.2019 and about four years have passed and the trial of the said complaint case has not yet began and the opposite party no.2 has not yet filed the reply to the complaint and the application u/S 143A N.I. Act filed by the applicant is still pending for disposal and due to non-cooperation of the opposite party no.2, the instant complaint case is being adjourned from time to time. Therefore, he has prayed for a direction for expeditious disposal of the instant case.

¶4Learned counsel for State submits that since about four years have already passed and as per the provisions of Section 143(3) N.I. Act, such complaint u/S 138 of N.I. Act, is required to be disposed of expeditiously and every endeavor has to be made by the learned Magistrate to dispose of the same within the period of six months. However, since more than four years have passed, therefore, he don't have objection if any direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the said complaint case by this Court.

¶5Having heard the submissions made by learned counsels for the parties, this Court has gone through the record of the case and from the order-sheet of the trial court, it is apparent that the complaint was filed on 21.12.2019 and the opposite party no.2 was summoned on 27.02.2020. Thereafter, there is no much progress in the case. On 10.06.2022, the opposite party no.2 was granted bail and on 25.07.2022, the applicant herein had moved an application u/S 143A N.I. Act for interim compensation during the pendency of the trial. However, due to non-cooperation of the opposite party no.2 the said application could not have been decided till date and what to say about the beginning of the trial as the opposite party no.2 has not yet filed his reply to the complaint as such. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case where the direction in terms of Section 143 N.I. Act can be issued for expeditious disposal of the complaint case.

¶6In view thereof, it is hereby directed that the learned Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Deoria, shall proceed in the case of expeditious and make all his endeavor to conclude the trial in the complaint case in terms of Section 143 of the N.I. Act.

¶7With the aforesaid directions, the instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Shubham Arya High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.