Sameer Alias Neelu v. State of U.P

Court No. - 74 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46541 of 2023 Applicant :- Sameer Alias Neelu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶1Learned AGA for the State submits that the instructions have been received and he has no objection in case the bail application is decided on merits.

¶2Heard counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-opposite party.

¶3The instant bail application, under Section 439 Cr.P.C., has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 672 of 2022, under Section 8/21 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station-Robertsganj, District-Sonbhadra, during the pendency of trial.

¶4Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. False recovery of 18 gm Heroin has been shown from the applicant, which is below commercial quantity. There is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. The mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of N.D.P.S. Act have not been complied with. There is no F.S.L. report to establish that the substance recovered is Heroin. The applicant is in jail since 07.09.2022, having no criminal history. In case, he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶5Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶6Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record this Court prima facie finds that the alleged contraband was below commercial quantity. The mandatory provisions of the N.D.P.S. Act have not been complied with. Further, the applicant has no criminal antecedents and has remained confined for more than one year and after submission of the charge-sheet there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶7Let the applicant Sameer Alias Neelu, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he:

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶8In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Sachin Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad