- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 41294/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41294 of 2023 Applicant :- Abhishek @ Sheshmani Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava,Rakesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. There is allegation against the applicant of committing offence of rape of the victim. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that from the long statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it is clear that the age of victim is about 20 years. She has eloped with applicant and went to different places without complaint and entered into physical relationship. Medical report does not supports the allegations made in the first information report. First information report is delayed by 24 days. There is no explanation of the same. Applicant is well known to the victim and also related to her. He is in jail since 19.07.2023 and has no criminal history to his credit. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the above submissions. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and recent judgment dated
11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant, Abhishek @ Sheshmani, involved in Case Crime No.38 of 2023, under Section 376 I.P.C, Police Station Durgaganj, District-Bhadohi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court. Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 SS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.