Saroj Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39196 of 2023 Petitioner :- Saroj Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mishra,Uday Shanker Dubey,Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1Heard Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.

¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No.2, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Bara, District Prayagraj to decide the case No. RST/ 2464 of 2022, Computerized case N. T202202030702464 (Ramvishal Singh Vs. Ramkripal Singh), under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.

¶3Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid mutation case is pending before respondent no.2 for adjudication.

¶4Copy of the order sheet has been annexed as Annexure No.5 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding according to the provisions contained under Rule 34 (7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Bara, District Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned mutation case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad