Daya Shankar @ Daya Ram v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21183 of 2022 Petitioner :- Daya Shankar @ Daya Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Kumar Upadhyay,Krishna Kant Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Azad Rai Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Vikas Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶2After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the Case No. T202202030801808 under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶3Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no. 2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶4Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no. 2 is hereby directed to consider and decide the Case No. T202202030801808 under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶5With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 P.Sri. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad