- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37926/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37926 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babu Lal Ram,Rachana Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
¶1Heard Sri Babu Lal Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4 and perused the record.
¶2In view of the nature of order proposed to be passed, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent nos. 5 and 6.
¶3It is contended that on account of sickness of the petitioner's counsel before the Prescribed Authority, written statement could not be filed and, therefore, the Prescribed Authority has, by order impugned dated 21.9.2023, closed the opportunity to file written statement.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner has already filed an application dated 5.10.2023 requesting grant of time for filing objection/written statement and, therefore, the order impugned may be quashed.
¶5Considering the fact that proceedings under Section 25 of the Societies Registration Act substantively decide the rights of the parties in relation to society dispute, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent no.3 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Kanpur Nagar, to consider and decide the petitioner's application dated 5.10.2023 by the end of December, 2023, after providing due opportunity of hearing to both the parties, provided a certified copy of this order is filed before the respondent no.3 by the end of this Month. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 CS/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.