- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 November 2023
- Case no.
- A227 11563/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11563 of 2023 Petitioner :- Manju Singh Respondent :- Satya Narain Singh And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
¶1Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause during the course of the day.
¶2Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/petitioners and perused the record.
¶3In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
¶4The basic relief sought by the petitioner/petitioners in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to direct the court below to decide Original Suit No. 680 of 2019 (Satya Narain Singh and another vs. Manju Singh) expeditiously.
¶5The matter is pending before the Court below since 2019 and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter.
¶6In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid suit strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 16.11.2023 S.K. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.