VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dhanesh v. State of U.P

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
15 November 2023
Case no.
BAIL 44862/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 75 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44862 of 2023 Applicant :- Dhanesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Pandey,Vaibhav Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶1Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶2By means of this bail application applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 68 of 2023, under Sections 3 (1) Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) At-1986, Police Station Shahganj, District - Sonbhadra, during the pendency of trial.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. In the gang chart the applicant have only two criminal cases, in which he has already been enlarged on bail. Copy of the bail order is annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the affidavit. In addition to that, the applicant have only one criminal history, in which he has also been enlarged on bail. Copy of the bail order is annexed as Annexure No. SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicant further contended that co-accused Sunil Gupta, Miya, who has been assigned the similar role has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 44891 of 2023 on 01.11.2023. There is no previous criminal history to the credit of applicant. There is no likelihood of his abscondence or tampering with the evidence. The applicant claims parity, he is in jail since 07.08.2023. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶5Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application but he could not dispute the submission made above.

¶6Having regard to the facts, circumstances and the submissions made but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court is of opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶7Let the applicant - Dhanesh, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶8In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 16.11.2023 Vinod/Shahroz High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.