- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 34752/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34752 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Sunita Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jata Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. At the very outset learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition and states that the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of revision as provided against the impugned order. On the aforesaid learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready and willing to file revision, in case, such a revision is filed, a direction may be issued to decide the same within stipulated period. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy as provided under the law. However, it is provided that in case the revision is preferred by the petitioner within three weeks from today, the same shall be decided by the concerned court on merit in accordance with law, after hearing both the parties, expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 16.11.2023 Arti High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.