- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 3807/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3807 of 2023 Petitioner :- Kulbul Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶1Heard Sri Krishna Kumar Chaurasiya, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents.
¶2Present case is essentially arising out of an appeal which is pending before Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Basti.
¶3During pendency of appeal, the petitioner has filed an application to summon missilband record, whereupon a report was submitted by Lekhpal concerned dated 30.06.2018. Admittedly no cognizance was taken on said report by the Appellate Authority. Meanwhile, another application was filed by petitioner before Appellate Authority to defer the hearing of appeal till he get information under Right to Information Act. However, Appellate Authority has put up the case for hearing vide order dated 26.09.2018. It appears that this order was challenged before Revisional Authority by filing a revision, however, the same was rejected by means of impugned order dated 28.06.2023.
¶4From above referred facts it is evident that the matter has still not been heard by Settlement Officer of Consolidation on merit and it is pending since 2018. No material has been placed on record received under Right to Information Act. Therefore, there is no ground to defer the hearing of appeal.
¶5In aforesaid circumstances, without interfering with impugned order, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to Settlement Officer of Consolidation concerned to decide the appeal expeditiously in accordance with law after taking note of report dated 30.06.2018 submitted by the Lekhpal, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 16.11.2023 AK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.