- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 November 2023
- Case no.
- ABAIL 12524/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 73 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12524 of 2023 Applicant :- Anuj Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
¶1This second anticipatory bail application has been moved on behalf of the applicant Anuj Kumar seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 252 of 2022, under Section 395 IPC, Police Station Lodha, District Aligarh.
¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
¶3The only ground taken in this second anticipatory bail application is that after rejection of the first anticipatory bail application no. 8171 of 2023 by this Court vide order dated
3.8.2023 the applicant was declared as a juvenile offender by the Juvenile Justice Board vide order dated 25.9.2023. It is submitted that since the applicant has been declared as a juvenile offender, he is entitled for anticipatory bail.
¶4Learned AGA opposed the prayer.
¶5There is no provision of law that if an accused happens to be the juvenile offender in all cases he must be granted anticipatory bail. The first anticipatory bail application of the applicant has been decided on merits by this Court and only on the ground that subsequently the applicant was declared a juvenile offender, there is no compulsion of law to grant anticipatory to such accused.
¶6The application is rejected. Order Date :- 16.11.2023 safi High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.