- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 34028/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 46 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34028 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shafi Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shahnawaz Akhtar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jai Bahadur Singh Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J. In nutshell petitioner's grievance is that the authorities are wrongly removing his constructions on the premise that it is made on a public drain. A preliminary objection is raised on behalf of respondents on the ground that in respect of the same controversy the plaintiff has filed Original Suit No.778 of 2023 in which notices have been issued. Injunction has also been sought in respect of the same property. This fact has, however, not been disclosed in the writ petition. As a rule of prudence parallel remedies cannot be allowed to be pressed by the litigant, moreso, when such fact is suppressed. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain the present writ petition, which is, consequently, dismissed. All questions of fact are left open for appropriate examination/determination by the competent forum. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 Anil High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.