Rani Devi @ Veermati v. Board of Revenue and 5 Others

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3123 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rani Devi @ Veermati Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahabir Yadav,Vijay Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Narayan Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 17.01.2023 passed by respondent no. 1 in revision No. 2174 of 2022 District Kannauj Vs. Computer Case No. AL20220339002174 (Rani Devi @ Veermati Vs. Bhoora Singh and others) Under Section 210 of Revenue Code 2006 and order dated 30.05.2022 passed by respondent no. 3 in Case No./Revision No.807 of 2021 Bhoora Singh and others Vs. Rani Devi @ Veermati as Computer Case No. 202103000001807 Under Section 210 of Revenue Code 2006."

¶3An order dated 20.09.2021 was passed in favour of petitioner in proceeding under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, directing that the name of the petitioner be entered in the revenue records. Against the aforesaid order, a revision was filed by respondent no. 4 before the Commissioner, Kanpur Mandal Kanpur and the same was allowed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) Kanpur Nagar by order dated

30.05.2022. The order dated 20.09.2021 was set aside and the matter was remanded to the court of Tehsildar. Against the order dated 30.05.2022, the petitioner preferred a revision and the same has been dismissed by the revisional court by order dated

17.01.2023.

¶4Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that since the matter has been remanded to the Tehsildar and both the parties have appeared, it would be appropriate in the interest of justice that the proceedings under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 be decided expeditiously.

¶5There is no objection on behalf of respondents, in case the prayer of the petitioner is allowed.

¶6In view of the above, respondent No. 5 is directed to decide the aforesaid proceedings in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

¶7With the aforesaid direction, this petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad