- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 39492/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39492 of 2023 Petitioner :- Radha Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Srivastava, learned State Law Officer for the state-respondents.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed, seeking a writ of mandamus, commanding respondent no.2/Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Dhanghata) to decide Case No.926/2023 (Radha Devi vs. Padohi) (Computer Case No.T202317650100926), under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within the stipulated time.
¶3Counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.2. Copy of the order sheet has been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the writ petition, in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding according to the provisions of Rule 34(7) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016.
¶4In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid proceedings to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 3 months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 C.Prakash High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.