Chandrashekhar v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and 4 Others

Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3817 of 2023 Petitioner :- Chandrashekhar Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sai Girdhar,Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

¶1Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, after arguing for some time, submits that by means of impugned order the challenge to valuation of plot allotted to petitioner was rejected on the ground of jurisdiction under Section 20 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, however, no alternative remedy was disclosed in the order.

¶2Learned counsel for petitioner initially submits that grievance of petitioner can be considered under aforesaid provision but later on considering the submission of learned Standing Counsel, he fairly submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach concerned authority under Section 9 of Act of 1953 to ventilate his grievance.

¶3In aforesaid circumstances, without interfering with impugned order, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty, as prayed for. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 AK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad