- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 33981/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33981 of 2023 Petitioner :- Nandu Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bipin Lal Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Udit Chandra Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
¶1Instructions filed today be kept on record.
¶2On the basis of the fact that there was a theft of electricity, a provisional assessment dated 31.5.2022 was served upon the petitioner. Thereafter the petitioner represented to the Electricity Department on 11.5.2023. The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the representation of the petitioner be decided as per Clause 6.8 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005.
¶3We do not find any reason to doubt that the Electricity Department would not decide the representation of the petitioner as per Clause 6.8 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005.
¶4However, since learned counsel for the Electricity Department himself has stated that on 4.11.2023, the Electricity Department has come out with a One Time Settlement scheme, we provide that the petitioner be also, if he so desires, given the benefit of One Time Settlement scheme dated 4.11.2023.
¶5With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 GS (Manoj Bajaj, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.