VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ishu Yadav @ Himanshu Yadav v. State of U.P

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 November 2023
Case no.
BAIL 46316/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46316 of 2023 Applicant :- Ishu Yadav @ Himanshu Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bijay Singh Sachan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

¶1Heard Sri B.S. Sachan, learned counsel for the applicant and Dr. S.B. Maurya, learned AGA-I for the State-respondent.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 991 of 2022, under Sections 302/201 IPC, Police Station-Chakeri, District-Kanpur Nagar, during pendency of the trial in the court below.

¶3FIR of the present case was lodged against unknown person and according to the FIR, son of the applicant aged about 18 years had gone from his house to his school in the morning on 31.10.2022 but did not return and on 01.11.2022 his dead body was found near the railway track.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that FIR of the present case was lodged against unknown person and after 10 months when the statement of one Sandeep Tiwari, who claimed himself to be an eye-witness, was recorded then he disclosed the name of the applicant and two other accused persons, Sahil Yadav and Vikas Yadav.

¶5He further submitted that during investigation, IO also recorded the statement of one Asha Devi, who does not claim herself to be an eye-witness and only stated that she witnessed the applicant and other accused persons alongiwith the deceased.

¶6He further submitted that bail applications of co-accused Sahil Yadav and Vikas Yadav have already been allowed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 06.11.2023 and 28.06.2023 and case of applicant is exactly at par with them. He placed both the bail orders during the course of argument, which are taken on record and collectively marked as 'A'.

¶7He further submitted that applicant is not having any criminal history and he is in jail since 10.09.2023.

¶8Per contra, learned AGA although, opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the fact that name of the applicant was surfaced in the present matter after 10 months and bail applications of co-accused Sahil Yadav and Vikas Yadav have been allowed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court and case of applicant is at par with them.

¶9I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.

¶10Considering the fact that present case is a case of circumstantial evidence and name of the applicant was surfaced after 10 months through the statement of Sandeep Tiwari alongwith co-accused Sahil Yadav and Vikas Yadav and co-accused Sahil Yadav and Vikas Yadav have already been released on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court and case of applicant is at par with them, in my view, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.

¶11Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed.

¶12Let the applicant-Ishu Yadav @ Himanshu Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.

¶13In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant.

¶14It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 KK Patel High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.